Tuesday, February 1, 2011

ramble rumble

I realize that The Plague by Albert Camus is not such a confusing book as I thought when I began to read it. As I progressed along I found that it was not so much that I was getting confused about what was happening, but rather that I was letting my mind wander during those long series of pages where the narrator would ramble on about seemingly irrelevant topics. As a result the book is about as boring as a late 1940’s movie. I guess it was due to the fact that I was not reading deeply enough into those sections in an attempt to find correlations and higher meanings to the story as a whole. Or maybe I was trying too hard to get stoked and excited by and entirely unexciting book. Now I don’t want to send the wrong message, this book is much better than The Handmaids Tale, and as far as completing the existentialism topic for this month, The Plague does a very good job of giving voice and image to “existence precedes essence.” Maybe I’m just more of a nonfiction kind of person.

1 comment:

  1. "Better than The Handmaid's Tale"--coming from you, Colten, that sounds a lot like damning with faint praise.

    I hope things pick up for you in the second half of the novel.

    ReplyDelete